|
ATCC
human bone osteosarcoma cells Human Bone Osteosarcoma Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/human bone osteosarcoma cells/product/ATCC Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human bone osteosarcoma cells - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
98/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
u2os cells U2os Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/u2os cells/product/ATCC Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
u2os cells - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
osteosarcoma cells u2os Osteosarcoma Cells U2os, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/osteosarcoma cells u2os/product/ATCC Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
osteosarcoma cells u2os - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
u 2 os cells htb 96 ![]() U 2 Os Cells Htb 96, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/u 2 os cells htb 96/product/ATCC Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
u 2 os cells htb 96 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
u 2 os cells ![]() U 2 Os Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/u 2 os cells/product/ATCC Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
u 2 os cells - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
cell culturing u 2 os cells ![]() Cell Culturing U 2 Os Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cell culturing u 2 os cells/product/ATCC Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cell culturing u 2 os cells - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
cell lines ![]() Cell Lines, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cell lines/product/ATCC Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cell lines - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
wild type u2os cells ![]() Wild Type U2os Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/wild type u2os cells/product/ATCC Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
wild type u2os cells - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: Nucleic Acids Research
Article Title: Investigation of TRMT61B methyltransferase activity on mRNA and its effects on translation
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkag365
Figure Lengend Snippet: Overexpressed TRMT61B methylates thousands of sites across the transcriptome. ( A ) Schematic of TRMT61B overexpression (OE) in U-2 OS cells and m 1 A-IP. RNA was purified, polyA-selected, immunoprecipitated, and then prepared into libraries with a TruSeq Stranded mRNA Library Prep kit (Illumina). Both control and TRMT61B OE m 1 A-IP were carried out in duplicate. ( B ) Volcano plot showing DESeq2 results depicting fold changes in transcript abundance in m 1 A-IP samples compared to input samples under TRMT61B OE conditions. Top 30 hits by -log 10 (p adj ) are labeled, and mitochondrial genes are highlighted in red. ( C ) Volcano plot showing single-nucleotide sites called by bakR as having altered misincorporation levels in TRMT61B OE conditions versus control OE conditions, with “high-confidence” YMRA sites (bakR hits with additional filtering of P < .05, difference in log-odds of mutation rate >1, >1% mutation rate in both replicates, >5% average mutation rate in IP, and <5% average mutation rate in input samples) highlighted in red. Top 30 hits are labeled. ( D ) RNA types of all high-confidence single-nucleotide sites, regardless of methylated motif. ( E ) Regions of modification for all high-confidence sites, regardless of methylated motif. ( F ) Top motif discovered in high-confidence sites using STREME , covering 74.3% of all sites. ( G ) RNA type of high-confidence sites, filtered to only YMRA-motif sites. ( H ) Regions of modification for high-confidence sites, filtered to only YMRA-motif sites. ( I ) Metagene plot showing distribution of YMRA-containing high-confidence sites.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Over Expression, Purification, Immunoprecipitation, Control, Labeling, Mutagenesis, Methylation, Modification
Journal: Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
Article Title: Oxidative DNA Damage Exacerbates the Mutagenic Potential of Alternative DNA Structures via Altered DNA Repair Processing
doi: 10.1002/em.70059
Figure Lengend Snippet: Mutation frequencies of B‐DNA and H‐DNA sequences with or without oxidative damage and XPA, a key NER protein. B‐DNA‐ or H‐DNA‐forming reporter sequences were exposed to different levels of oxidative stress (−, +, or ++) and then transfected into human U2OS cell lines with either (A and B) wild type or (C and D) XPA knockout phenotypes to allow for DNA repair processing. Mutation frequencies were quantified (A and C) using a blue‐white screening assay. Each condition represents the average of at least three replicates (+SEM). Statistical comparisons between conditions were performed using a two‐way ANOVA with significance indicated as p < 0.05 (*), or < 0.01 (**). Mutation spectra were then determined (B and D) using Sanger sequencing, with at least 15 mutants analyzed per condition and classified as point mutations (1 bp), small deletions (< 15 bp), or large deletions (> 15 bp). Mutation spectra ratios are shown per condition as a ratio of mutation frequency.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Mutagenesis, Transfection, Knock-Out, Screening Assay, Sequencing
Journal: Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
Article Title: Oxidative DNA Damage Exacerbates the Mutagenic Potential of Alternative DNA Structures via Altered DNA Repair Processing
doi: 10.1002/em.70059
Figure Lengend Snippet: Mutation frequencies of B‐DNA and H‐DNA sequences with or without oxidative damage and key BER proteins. B‐DNA‐ or H‐DNA‐forming reporter sequences were exposed to increasing levels of oxidative stress (−, +, or ++) and then transfected into human U2OS cell lines with either (A and B) OGG1 knockout or (C and D) APE1 knockout phenotypes to allow for DNA repair processing. Mutation frequencies were then quantified (A and C) using a blue‐white screening assay. Each condition represents the average of at least three replicates (+SEM). Statistical comparisons between conditions were performed using a two‐way ANOVA with significance indicated as p < 0.05 (*), < 0.01 (**), or < 0.001 (***). Mutation spectra were then determined (B and D) using Sanger sequencing, with at least 15 mutants analyzed per condition and classified as point mutations (1 bp), small deletions (< 15 bp), or large deletions (> 15 bp). Mutation spectra ratios are shown per condition as a ratio of mutation frequency.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Mutagenesis, Transfection, Knock-Out, Screening Assay, Sequencing
Journal: Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
Article Title: Oxidative DNA Damage Exacerbates the Mutagenic Potential of Alternative DNA Structures via Altered DNA Repair Processing
doi: 10.1002/em.70059
Figure Lengend Snippet: Association of XPA and APE1 proteins with B‐DNA or H‐DNA sequences with or without oxidative damage and key BER or NER proteins. B‐DNA‐ or H‐DNA‐forming reporter sequences were first exposed to increasing levels of oxidative stress (−, +, or ++). Reporter sequences were then transfected into human U2OS cell lines with (A) wild‐type (previously published matched control (Zewail‐Foote et al. )), (B) XPA knockout, or (C) APE1 knockout phenotypes for DNA repair processing. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was then used to measure the association of XPA or APE1 proteins with B‐DNA or H‐DNA sequences. Protein association is shown as a percentage of total input DNA (% input). Each condition shows the average % input of three replicates (+SEM). Condition comparisons use a Wilcoxon rank sums approach demonstrating p < 0.05 (*), or < 0.01 (**).
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Transfection, Control, Knock-Out, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation